ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparing Efficacy Between Restricted Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in Bilateral TKA

T

Thammasat University Hospital

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

TKA
Osteoarthritis, Knee

Treatments

Procedure: Mechanical alignment
Procedure: Restricted kinematic alignment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06323577
TUH rKA vs MA TKA

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this RCT is to investigate efficacy between restricted kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment TKA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Does rKA have better functional outcomes than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients?
  • Does rKA have lower pain score than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients? Participants will undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA and randomized one side will use rKA and the other side will use MA.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-80 years
  • Diagnosis bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee joint and undergo simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • ASA classification I-II

Exclusion criteria

  • Valgus deformity
  • BMI > 40kg/m2
  • History of previous knee surgery
  • Active infection of the knee joint

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Restricted kinematic alignment
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: Restricted kinematic alignment
Mechanical alignment
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: Mechanical alignment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems