Comparing Efficacy of Dry Needling Combined with Passive Stretching and Muscle Energy Technique on Myofascial Trigger Points

University of Peradeniya

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Neck Pain

Treatments: Procedure: Dry Needling

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06780904

DPTAHS

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the efficacy of dry needling (minimally invasive treatment by using a tiny needle) combined with two types of stretching techniques in patients with neck pain for more than 3 months. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Which combination of treatment will 1.give faster relief of pain? 2.improve neck range of motion? and 3.improve disability level of a person with neck pain.

Participants who are interested will be selected according to eligibility criteria. Participants will be divided into two groups. Initially researcher will assess and interview the participants. Two groups will receive two different combinations of interventions. Pre and post measurements will be obtained and then treatment efficacy will be assessed.

Full description

46 participants who are interested in this study will be recruited by using convenient sampling method and according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants then will be divided into two groups by using opaque sealed envelop method.

Initially participants will be interviewed an outcome measures will be taken. As outcome measures Pain will be assessed by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Disability level will be assessed by using Neck Disability Index(NDI), and Neck Range of Motion will be measured by using Universal Goniometer. Participants will receive interventions, two times per week for two weeks. Soon after the last intervention, same outcome measures will be taken again.

Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 27 (IBM, USA) for Windows will be used for data analysis. The data will be examined using exploratory statistics, and the distributions will be inspected for violations of normality using graphical methods and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics of the demographic variables and test measurements will be calculated. Based on the satisfaction or violation of normal distribution assumptions, pain intensity (VAS), neck ROMs, pain intensity, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be analyzed using parametric or non-parametric tests. Baseline data for pain intensity, neck ROMs and NDI and pain intensity will be compared between the two intervention groups using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The difference-in changes in each outcome relative to the baseline between intervention groups will be compared using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Enrollment: 46 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 60 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Presence of neck pain for at least 3 months or more
• Presence of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle, either unilaterally or bilaterally
• Age between 18 and 60 years

Exclusion criteria

• Having an ongoing infection or fever
• Presence of shoulder pathology, such as tendinopathy, impingement syndrome, capsulitis, or bursitis
• History of direct trauma to the shoulder or neck
• Immunosuppressed individuals (e.g., those with cancer)
• Pregnant or recently delivered
• Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
• History of previous neck or shoulder surgery
• Previous local steroid injection or acupuncture
• Any abnormality that restricts cervical range of motion (e.g., degenerative changes, cervical spine spondylolisthesis, disc protrusion, extrusion, or sequestration observed in MRI)
• Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
• Needle phobia
• Metal allergies
• Cervical instability
• Presence of local skin lesions or infections
• Significant cognitive impairment or uncooperative behavior
• Participants who have previously undergone any form of physiotherapy intervention for the treatment of neck pain or related conditions

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

46 participants in 2 patient groups

Treatment group 1

Active Comparator group

Description:

Dry needling + Passive stretching

Treatment:

Procedure: Dry Needling

Treatment group 2

Other group

Description:

Dry needling + Muscle Energy technique

Treatment:

Procedure: Dry Needling