ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparing FEES to VFSS in Diagnosing Laryngeal Penetration and Aspiration in Infants in the NICU

Baylor Scott and White Health (BSWH) logo

Baylor Scott and White Health (BSWH)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Deglutition Disorders

Treatments

Other: FEES
Other: VFSS

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02003287
012-282

Details and patient eligibility

About

The main purpose of the study is to determine whether the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is effective in detecting laryngeal penetration and tracheal aspiration when compared with the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) in bottle-feeding infants in the NICU. A secondary objective is to determine whether FEES can be used to detect laryngeal penetration and tracheal aspiration in breastfeeding NICU infants.

Enrollment

25 patients

Sex

All

Ages

37+ weeks old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 37 weeks or more postmenstrual age
  • Diagnosis or suspicion of laryngeal penetration and/or tracheal aspiration by neonatal therapist and/or physician
  • Inpatient at Baylor University Medical Center NICU

Exclusion criteria

  • Not medically stable enough to undergo both FEES and VFSS as determined by neonatal therapist and/or physician
  • Bilateral complete cleft lip and palate

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

25 participants in 2 patient groups

FEES
Experimental group
Description:
Swallowing evaluation with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
Treatment:
Other: FEES
VFSS
Active Comparator group
Description:
Swallowing evaluation with the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study
Treatment:
Other: VFSS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems