Status
Conditions
About
This study is for patients with breast cancer and the objective is to compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) based on scar placement in patients undergoing standard breast-conserving surgery (sBCS). BCS has become the standard of care for eligible patients with breast cancer (current UK national BCS rate is 60%).
Scar placement for sBCS can be divided into two groups: those directly over the cancer, or those in remote locations (e.g. around the nipple, near the armpit, the lower part of the breast, where the breast and the chest meet etc.) with the aim of hiding the scar in more visually acceptable locations on the breast. Multiple factors determine where the scar is placed such as aesthetics, other health conditions, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes.
The growing importance on breast cosmesis has led to more attention from clinicians and patients with regards to the selection of surgical incision placement for sBCS. By using a validated questionnaire (BREAST-Q), we wish to assess if there is any difference in PROMs based on scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) in patients undergoing sBCS.
It is anticipated that the study results will help champion and guide care for future breast cancer patients, as well as providing an insight into how patient satisfaction may vary between different sBCS approaches.
This questionnaire study will include consecutive patients undergoing sBCS at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
Participation in this non-randomised study will not impact on routine clinical care or decision making for the type of surgery planned or scar placement choice. Patients will be asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire prior to surgery, after 2 weeks, as well as 3 and 12 months after surgery.
Full description
Advances in surgical techniques, has led to a growing importance on breast appearance (cosmesis). Presently, scar placement for standard breast conserving surgery (sBCS) can vary from either directly over the cancer or be in remote locations with the aim of hiding the scar in more aesthetically acceptable locations on the breast.
A number of factors dictate the outcome of scar placement such as aesthetics, comorbidities, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes in short- or long- term post-surgery as we do not have sufficient information from the patient's point of view of their experience and satisfaction.
We will use a validated patient outcomes questionnaire for breast surgery (BREAST-Q) to compare patient satisfaction with scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) for patients undergoing sBCS. We hope that the results will provide valuable additional information when future patients are counselled with regards to scar placement.
The principle research objective is to assess the impact of scar placement location on patient reported and clinical outcomes utilising the BREAST-Q questionnaire in patients undergoing standard breast conserving surgery (sBCS).
Secondary objectives include:
The patient will receive instructions for completing the questionnaires from the study team. These can be completed either in paper forms or electronically. Additionally, socio-demographic and routine clinical data collected as part of standard care (including but not limited to complications and other treatments required, such as radiotherapy) will be recorded.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Scar over the lesion defined as radial, transverse, vertical, oblique scar over the tumour lesion location in the breast Remote incisions defined as lateral perimeter/periareolar/infra-mammary fold/ benelli/hemi-batwing
Exclusion criteria
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sue M Dr Hartup, PhD, RGN; Baek Mr Kim, FRCS, MD, MA
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal