Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The overall goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different follow up protocols for scheduled but not attended ("no-show") Well-Child Visits, relative to care-as-usual (no standardized or typical follow up procedure). The main goals are to:
Full description
Well-Child visits (WCV) are at the core of preventive care in pediatrics. These Visits are an important opportunity for patients to be engaged with the healthcare system, for assessing child health and development, and for screening and counseling for prevention. Missed WCVs have been associated with negative health outcomes as well as avoidable healthcare costs and may occur for a variety of different reasons. There is room for improving follow-up with families to re-engage patients after not attending a scheduled WCV ("no-show"). This study will test and compare a text messaging intervention and community health worker outreach intervention to care-as-usual (no standard follow-up) as strategies for proactively engaging families in care after no-show to promote rescheduling and visit attendance. Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both interventions will inform clinical practice and decision-making in healthcare to help ultimately improve pediatric preventive care.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
- Already rescheduled their appointment by the time the sample list was generated
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
5,885 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Taylor J. Arnold, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal