Comparing the Effectiveness of 2 Diets for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

University of Michigan

Status: Completed

Conditions: Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Treatments: Other: Dietary intervention

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01624610

UMGI-DIETIBS

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the study is to find out if the diets often recommended for patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) provide adequate relief. The study will compare two diets that are used to treat IBS-D symptoms to see which one is more effective. The study will also measure the effect of these diets on the bowel flora, which are the good bacteria that inhabit the bowels in healthy people.

Full description

As irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms are often refractory to conventional therapies, there has been increasing interest in the role of diet in IBS. Certain foods may exacerbate symptoms of IBS. Thus, restricted diets have recently gained attention for the treatment IBS. The mechanism by which symptoms are improved is unclear, but these diets may improve symptoms by exerting changes on the GI microbiome.

Aims:

Primary Objective:

-Compare the proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) reporting adequate relief on Diet 1 vs Diet 2

Secondary Objectives:

• Assess the effects of these diets in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS on the gastrointestinal microbiota and blood based biomarkers.
• Compare the efficacy of Diet 1 vs Diet 2 in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS on pre-specified clinical and quality of life endpoints.

Methods:

This is a prospective randomized control trial of adults meeting the Rome III criteria for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). After a 2 week screening period and randomization, during which the severity of symptoms will be assessed and eligibility determined, patients will be randomized to Diet 1 vs Diet 2 for a period of 4 weeks.

The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the proportion of patients in each group reporting adequate relief of their IBS symptoms. For the secondary clinical outcomes, a responder definition incorporating abdominal pain and stool consistency as proposed by the FDA will be utilized. Key IBS-D symptoms will be assessed daily and adequate relief of IBS-D symptoms will be assessed weekly during the randomization period. We will also determine if a difference can be detected with high probability in the relative abundance and variety of specific bacterial taxa between the two groups before and after the 4 week dietary intervention. In addition, blood samples will be collected before and after randomization to measure relevant biomarkers of immune activation.

Enrollment: 100 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Meet Rome III criteria for IBS as assessed by a gastroenterologist:
• Fulfill the Rome III stool consistency criteria for IBS -D
• Willingness to maintain a stable dosage of IBS medications during the pretreatment baseline period, including tricyclic antidepressants; "rescue" medications permitted (ie Loperamide 2mg up to 4 times per day prn diarrhea)
• Ability to provide written informed consent for study participation
• Capable of independently completing all requirements of the study including returning for required visits
• Documentation of normal colonoscopy with colon biopsies within five years
• Documentation of normal TSH, CBC, electrolyte panel
• Negative evaluation for celiac disease either with normal TTG, EMA, and/or duodenal biopsy.

Exclusion criteria

• Unable to understand or provide written informed consent
• Pregnancy
• IBS with constipation or mixed subtype
• Comorbid medical problems that may affect gastrointestinal transit or motility:
• Inflammatory bowel disease
• Extraintestinal disease known to affect the gastrointestinal system (ie, scleroderma, unstable thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
• Severe renal or hepatic disease
• Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic/urologic surgery
• Previous treatment with some diets for IBS
• Concurrent medications not permitted including probiotics, antibiotics, and narcotics
• Active participation in another form of dietary therapy
• Patients who have undergone surgery to the GI tract except appendectomy or cholecystectomy if performed more than six months prior to enrollment.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Diet 1

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients randomized to this arm will receive both written and face-to-face advice about how the components of Diet 1 can be used to control their IBS symptoms.

Treatment:

Other: Dietary intervention

Diet 2

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients randomized to this arm will receive both written and face-to-face advice about how the components of Diet 2 can be used to control their IBS symptoms.

Treatment:

Other: Dietary intervention