Comparison Between Different Technologies That Measure Respiratory Rate

Oridion

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 4

Conditions: Healthy

Treatments: Device: Capnostream20p; Device: Radical 7; Device: PTAF2

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Industry

Identifiers

NCT02657720

10141352

Details and patient eligibility

About

Respiration rate is a critical vital sign that provides early detection of respiratory compromise and patient distress. Continuous monitoring of respiration rate is performed in patients under different clinical conditions, including post-surgery or different respiratory diseases. Clinician observation, pulse oximetry, and capnography are used individually or in combination to monitor ventilation during sedation and on post-surgical patients. The American Society of Anesthesiologists mandates the monitoring of respiration by measuring end tidal carbon dioxide (RRetco2) during procedural sedation and anesthesia. Other techniques for respiration rate measurement include different technologies such as acoustic respiratory rate (RRa). The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of RRetco2 and RRa under certain respiratory conditions.

Enrollment: 29 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 40 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Without Clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
• Without Clinical diagnosis of heart disease.

Exclusion criteria

• Want to be excluded
• Breathing difficulties
• Unabling or unwilling to follow the protocol.
• Contact allergy to the adhesive neck sensor.

Trial design

29 participants in 1 patient group

Healthy volunteers

Other group

Description:

Respiration rate will be measured using several medical devices: Radical-7, Capnostream20p and PTAF2 (flow meter)

Treatment:

Device: PTAF2

Device: Capnostream20p

Device: Radical 7