ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation for Recurrent/Residual HCC

N

National Cancer Center (NCC)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Residual Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Treatments

Procedure: radiofrequency ablation
Radiation: Proton beam therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01963429
NCCCTS 13-695

Details and patient eligibility

About

This phase 3 study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hypofractionated proton beam radiation.

Full description

The sample size for this study was based on a non-inferiority design. Primary objective: estimate local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate in two treatments Primary endpoint: 2-year LPFS rate Expected 2-year LPFS rate in the RFA: 85% Accural time and follow up time: 24 months and 24 months, respectively. Precision for 2-year LPFS rate estimation: Allowing a difference of 15% as the non-inferiority margin, with a power of 80% and a type I error level of 5%, evaluable 68 patients are required.

Considering 5% of follow-up loss, we need 72 patients in each arm, so a total of 144 patients will be enrolled.

Enrollment

144 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • HCC diagnosed as (i) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 200 IU/ml and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in one or more CT/MRI/angiograms, or (ii) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level less than 200 IU/ml, and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in two or more CT/MRI/angiograms or (iii) histological confirmation
  • HCC patients who had recurrent or residual tumor after other treatments
  • without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • the largest diameter of tumor should be less than 3cm, and the number of tumor ≤2
  • no previous treatment to target tumors by other forms of RT
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class A or B7 (Child-Pugh score of ≤7)
  • Age of ≥18 years
  • performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • WBC count ≥ 2,000/mm3; hemoglobin level ≥ 7.5 g/dL; platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3; and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL; AST and ALT < 5.0× upper limit of normal; no ascites)
  • no serious comorbidities other than liver cirrhosis
  • written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • age < 18 years
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class B8-9 and C (Child-Pugh score of >7) or uncontrolled cases of active chronic hepatitis B
  • previous history of other forms of RT adjacent to target tumors
  • poor performance status of 3 to 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • pregnant or breast feeding status
  • previous history uncontrolled other malignancies within 2 years

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

144 participants in 2 patient groups

A(radiofrequency ablation )
Experimental group
Description:
radiofrequency ablation
Treatment:
Procedure: radiofrequency ablation
B(Proton)
Experimental group
Description:
hypofractionated proton beam therapy
Treatment:
Radiation: Proton beam therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems