ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison Between Respiratory Therapy With Cough Assist Technique and Usual Respiratory Therapy in Intensive Care Patients Suffering of Neurologic Disorder

University Hospitals (UH) logo

University Hospitals (UH)

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Neurologic Disorder

Treatments

Other: Usual respiratory therapy
Device: Cough assist (Philips,respironics)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01143103
cough assist (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The present study aims to compare the efficiency of respiratory therapy with cough assist and the efficiency of usual respiratory therapy in intensive care patients suffering of neurologic disorder and cough ineffectiveness. The investigators hypothesis is that cough assist is more efficient than usual respiratory care in this group of patients.

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Peak flow < 270 ml if the patient has one of the following diagnostic: post neurosurgery status, cerebral trauma, tetraparesia or tetraplegia

Exclusion criteria

  • Death expected in the following 24h
  • Bulbar dysfunction if extubated
  • pneumothorax
  • intracerebral mass effect
  • elevated intracranial pressure

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

0 participants in 2 patient groups

Respiratory therapy with cough assist
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Cough assist (Philips,respironics)
Usual respiratory therapy
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Other: Usual respiratory therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems