ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison Between Sensory and Motor Transcutaneous Electrical Nervous Stimulation on Electromyographic and Kinesiographic Activity of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder: a Controlled Clinical Trial

U

University of L'Aquila

Status

Completed

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorders

Treatments

Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Device: Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01832207
TMD-224301

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background The purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untreatment, on the surface electromyographic (sEMG) and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Methods Sixty female subjects, selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, suffering from unilateral TMD in remission were assigned to MTS, STS or untreatment. Pre- and post-treatment differences in the sEMG activity of temporalis anterior (TA), masseter (MM), digastric (DA) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM), as well in the interocclusal distance (ID), within group were tested using the Wilcoxon test, while differences among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test; the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.01.

Enrollment

60 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 30 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • age less than 30 years;
  • female gender
  • right-handed (7-10 points in Edinburgh inventory);
  • presence of complete permanent dentition, with the exception of the third molars;
  • normal occlusion;
  • diagnosis of unilateral arthrogenous TMD on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), Axis I, groups II and III

Exclusion criteria

  • having pacemaker or other electrical devices
  • previous experience of TENS or biofeedback
  • systemic diseases
  • history of local or general trauma
  • neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • muscular diseases
  • cervical pain
  • bruxism diagnosed by the presence of parafunctional facets and/or anamnesis of parafunctional tooth clenching and/or grinding
  • pregnancy
  • assumption of anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidepressant or myorelaxant drugs
  • fixed or removable prostheses
  • fixed restorations that affected the occlusal surfaces
  • previous or concurrent orthodontic or orthognathic treatment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

60 participants in 3 patient groups

MTS
Active Comparator group
Description:
Motor threshold of stimulation
Treatment:
Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
STS
Active Comparator group
Description:
Sensorial threshold of stimulation
Treatment:
Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Placebo
Sham Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems