ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison: Constant-rate Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing VS Variable-rate Feedback Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing

C

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

Status

Completed

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Treatments

Device: Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode
Device: Constant-rate Infusion mode

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03102333
CAUH-SP1

Details and patient eligibility

About

In the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently.

Full description

In the case of the existing iv-pca, the analgesic drug was injected into the patient at a constant rate (ex. 1 ml / hr) and additional pain was controlled through the bolus dose (1 ml).

As a result, the analgesic effect was insufficient, or the effect was excessive, causing side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness). Especially In spinal surgery, the degree of pain sharply decreases from day 1 to day 2. Classic iv-pca with constant infusion rate can not reflect this result. But in the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently. If the bolus button is not pressed for a certain period of time, it is expected that the injection rate will be reduced and the side effect caused by the analgesic agent will be decreased.

Enrollment

78 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 70 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Spine fusion surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital with IV- PCA under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Unrecorded type of anesthetic agent
  • Denial to the study
  • Brain disorder
  • Cardiopulmonary disease
  • Psychiatric disorders

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

78 participants in 2 patient groups

Constant-rate Infusion
Active Comparator group
Description:
INTERVENTION : Constant-rate Infusion mode : The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period
Treatment:
Device: Constant-rate Infusion mode
Variable-rate Feedback Infusion
Active Comparator group
Description:
INTERVENTION : Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode :The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period
Treatment:
Device: Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems