ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of 2 Depth of Sedation Indices in the Intensive Care Unit (PSIWAV)

U

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Status

Completed

Conditions

RASS-score
Deep Sedation
Post-cardiac Surgery

Treatments

Device: Neurowave and Sedline indices in view

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05587803
22056PSIWAV

Details and patient eligibility

About

In the intensive care unit of the Free University hospital of Brussels, sedated patients are standardly monitored with the Masimo SEDline device to see how deeply a patient is asleep. During this study we want to attach 1 extra device to 30 sedated patients, lying in the intensive care unit. This device, called the NeuroSENSE brain monitor from Neurowave systems, uses a different scale to indicate the ideal depth of sedation. In total, both devices will be hung on a patient for 2 times 35 minutes. At minute 33, a RASS score will be determined in each patient. This score will be determined by talking to the patient or administering a pain stimulus. Based on the reaction of the patient an estimation can be made how deeply a patient is sleeping. Our goal is to find out which device correlates best with the effective clinical state of the patient.

Full description

Adequate sedation level is important for patient comfort and safety. As under- and oversedation are common several devices are used that measure the Depth of Anesthesia (DoA). Each device uses its proprietary algorithm to calculate a depth of anesthesia index and each index has its own optimal range. The optimal range for the NeuroSense monitor (NeuroWave Systems inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) is between 40 and 60, while the optimal range for the SEDline monitor (Masimo Corporation; Irvine, CA, USA) is between 25 and 50. When the device indicates a value within these limits, the patient is optimally anesthetized for a surgical procedure. In this study, 30 patients will be monitored simultaneously by both the Neurowave and SedLine devices. The study will determine which device is the most accurate and therefore the most ideal for use in the ICU.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Sedated patients hospitalized in ICU of the University Hospital of Brussels
  • Patients who are monitored with the SEDline/Masimo monitor
  • Patients who receive Remifentanil at a maximum concentration of 0,2 μg/kg/min and propofol with a concentration between 0,5-4,0 mg/kg/h
  • Age above 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with facial trauma
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who received muscle re-laxants
  • Patients in prone position
  • Lack of informed consent from the family
  • Patients who are hemodynamically unstable
  • Patients with neurotrauma or every other neurologic disorder
  • Patients post neurosurgery

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 1 patient group

study group
Experimental group
Description:
This arm consists of all the patients that fulfill the inclusion and exclusion-criteria and are therefore suitable for the study. The Neurowave brain monitor is attached on the patients forehead and the study starts. At that moment the included patients are monitored by the Masimo/Sedline en the Neurosense/Neurowave monitor.
Treatment:
Device: Neurowave and Sedline indices in view

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems