Comparison of Accuracy of Full-arch Implant Digital and Conventional Impressions.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Edentulous Jaw

Treatments

Procedure: conventional impression

Procedure: digital impression

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07190820

SH9H-2025-T290-1

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the accuracy of digital impressions is comparable to conventional impressions. It will also learn about the clinical effect of different method. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does drug ABC lower the number of times participants need to use a rescue inhaler? What medical problems do participants have when taking drug ABC? Researchers will compare digital impression to conventional impression to see if the accuracy of the digital method.

Participants will:

Take an impression with one of the methods Visit the clinic a total of 6 times for checkups and tests

Enrollment

24 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Aged 30-80 years (inclusive) with no gender restriction.
Patients who will receive a full-arch one-piece implant-supported fixed
permanent restoration in the maxilla or mandible.
Patients with osseointegrated implants after surgery.
Patients voluntarily participate in the trial and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with a severe gag reflex.
Patients with insufficient interarch space in the posterior region for impression coping placement.
Patients with minimal inter-implant distance may prevent impression coping installation.
Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are unable to maintain prolonged mouth opening for impression procedures.
Other conditions deemed ineligible for inclusion by the investigator.