ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of BioHPP (High Performance Polymer) - vs Titanium- vs Zirconia Abutments

M

Medical University of Graz

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing

Treatments

Device: Zirconia abutment
Device: Titanium abutment
Device: BioHPP abutment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The project is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. The material BioHPP (High Performance Polymer) is compared with the gold-standard abutment materials titanium and zirconia in terms of peri-implant soft tissue healing.

Full description

A total of 60 participants are divided into three groups of 20 persons each. One group receives BioHPP abutments, while the two control groups receive titanium or zirconia abutments.

The patients are provided with closed healing dental implants. After 3 months, following implant exposure and optical impression, the implants are restored with individual abutments.

Follow-up appointments are scheduled at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation. During these visits, implant healing is assessed based on clinical parameters such as probing depth, plaque index, mean bone level, and bleeding on probing.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent
  • The patients must be between 18 and 99 years old.
  • non-smokers, former smokers, or light smokers (fewer than 10 cigarettes per day).
  • ASA ( American Society of Anesthesiologists) Class I or II.
  • There must be no pregnancy or breastfeeding period.
  • the patients must have an edentulous section of up to 3 teeth in the maxillary or mandibular region, where it is possible to place an implant
  • no allergy to any of the study-related materials

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 18 or over 99 years old.
  • Heavy smokers or former heavy smokers who quit less than five years ago
  • Existing pregnancy or breastfeeding period.
  • Individuals classified as ASA Class III to V.
  • Presence of a polymer allergy.
  • Patients with severe systemic diseases, immune deficiencies, or on corticosteroid medication.
  • Patients undergoing local radiation or bisphosphonate therapy.
  • Patients requiring sinus augmentation or soft tissue augmentation.
  • Participation in another dental study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

60 participants in 3 patient groups

BioHPP
Experimental group
Description:
High Performance Polymer as abutment material
Treatment:
Device: BioHPP abutment
Titanium
Active Comparator group
Description:
Titanium as abutment material
Treatment:
Device: Titanium abutment
Zirconia
Active Comparator group
Description:
Zirconia as abutment material
Treatment:
Device: Zirconia abutment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems