Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization

Status: Completed

Conditions: Postoperative Pain; Children, Only

Treatments: Procedure: Regional anesthesia intervention

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05688813

2021.51

Details and patient eligibility

About

Caudal block (CB) has been the method used for years to achieve adequate postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients, which is one of the main responsibilities of an anesthetist. CB, which has been proven to provide effective analgesia for many different indications, is the most commonly performed neuraxial block technique for postoperative pain control in urogenital surgeries. However, in the following years, truncal nerve blocks are recommended for postoperative analgesia by the literature both for more effective analgesia and for preventing complications of CB that may prevent early mobilization and prolong hospital discharge

Full description

Circumcision, which is widely performed in male children for cultural and religious reasons in our country, is one of the daily urological surgical procedures with painful postoperative period. However, in the following years, truncal nerve blocks are recommended for postoperative analgesia by the literature both for more effective analgesia and for preventing complications of CB that may prevent early mobilization and prolong hospital discharge. Based on this knowledge, in order to provide postoperative analgesia in urogenital surgeries in male children sacral ESP (SESP) block can be used as an alternative to CB due to its undesirable effects

Enrollment: 150 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 1 to 7 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• 1-7 years of age
• ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II group
• Scheduled for circumcision
• Able to communicate in Turkish
• Willing to participate to the study (parents and children)

Exclusion criteria

• Less than 1 or more than 7 years of age
• A neurological deficit, bleeding diathesis, or a history of local anesthetic allergy; an infection or redness in the injection area, congenital lumbar anomaly, liver and/or kidney disorder, a psychiatric disorder, mental retardation, or communication problems detected during examination
• Unwilling to to participate to the study ((parents or children)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

150 participants in 2 patient groups

Caudal block group

Experimental group

Description:

An echogenic block needle (22 Gauge 50 mm) was then advanced into the sacral canal through the sacrococcygeal membrane while a longitudinal position was used, continuing with the in-plane technique. After ensuring that there is no blood or cerebrospinal fluid with aspiration, 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine was administered while observing caudal epidural space dilation or turbulent flow with Doppler.

Treatment:

Procedure: Regional anesthesia intervention

Sacral erector spinae block

Experimental group

Description:

Following antiseptic preparation of block site linear ultrasound probe was placed longitudinally to midline just above the sacrum. After the median sacral crests and erector spinae were identified, a 22G, 50 mm block needle was advanced from the cranial to the caudal direction until it touched the top of the 4th median sacral crest with the in-plane technique. After hydrodissection was achieved with 1 ml of saline, 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered after negative aspiration.

Treatment:

Procedure: Regional anesthesia intervention