Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether the stethoscope can be used as a method of assessing endotracheal cuff pressure as effectively as a manometer and also to compare it with the balloon palpation/audible leak method frequently used in clinical practice in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare ''stethoscope'' and ''audible leak/balloon palpation'' groups to see if which method is effective like a manometer.
Full description
Although the use of a manometer is recommended in daily practice to evaluate endotracheal tube cuff pressure for intubated patients, the cuff is still inflated using balloon palpation or audible leakage methods in many centers. Manometers may not be available in most centers. An acceptable cuff pressure ranges from 20 to 30 cm H2O. While the risk of aspiration increases below 20 cm H2O, at values above 30 cm H2O the circulation of the tracheal mucosa begins to deteriorate and related complications like ulceration, stenosis, and even fistula may develop.
The authors hypothesize that the stethoscope is as effective as a manometer in assessing endotracheal tube cuff pressure where a manometer is not available.
After informed consent is obtained from patients who meet the inclusion criteria for the study, the patients will be intubated following anesthesia induction and the method by which the patients' endotracheal tube cuffs will be inflated will be determined in a randomized manner using the sealed envelope method. Then, the cuff pressures will be checked with a manometer by an expert who does not know the method by which the cuff is inflated, if necessary, it will be corrected and the data will be recorded with the code assigned to the method. Statistical evaluations will be made on the data obtained by an analyst who does not know the names of the methods and which method was applied to which patient.
The difference between our study and previous studies:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
176 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mustafa Soner Özcan, M.D.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal