Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare four different analgesic strategies in adults undergoing routine influenza immunization
Full description
In this study, we will compare relative effectiveness of 4 analgesic strategies (i.e., topical local anesthetics, vapocoolant spray, tactile stimulation and distraction) in adults undergoing routine immunization in order to provide further evidence of the effectiveness of each intervention and to determine if one method is superior to another. We are not including a 'no treatment' group because we do not wish to subject participants to unnecessary pain when there are available analgesic treatments. Moreover, in the presence of a 'no treatment' group, we cannot rule out a placebo effect for all treatment groups unless we provide a matched placebo for each intervention, which is not feasible. In future studies, we plan to address the added benefit of combining analgesic interventions (i.e., evaluating the effect of a multimodal approach).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
352 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal