ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study

K

Kocaeli University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intubation;Difficult

Treatments

Device: c-mac
Device: airtraq

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04153357
KOU KAEK 2016/315

Details and patient eligibility

About

İntubation of pediatric patients is a challenging problem. Video laryngoscopes increased the intubation success rate. We want to compare different video laryngoscopes in this field.

Full description

Aim:İntubation of pediatric patients is a challenging problem. Video laryngoscopes increased the intubation success rate. We want to compare different video laryngoscopes in this field.

methods: We enroll total 50 patients < 1 year old undergoing neurosurgery. We compared the intubation times, success rates and minor complications of Airtraq and c-mac video laryngoscopes in these pediatric patients undergoing neurosurgery.

Enrollment

50 patients

Sex

All

Ages

1 month to 1 year old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

< 1 years old

  • undergoing neurosurgery ASA 1-2

Exclusion criteria

  • > 1 year old
  • asa 3-4
  • emergency

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

intubation time airtraq
Active Comparator group
Description:
intubation time of Airtraq
Treatment:
Device: airtraq
intubation time of c-mac
Active Comparator group
Description:
intubation time of c-mac
Treatment:
Device: c-mac

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems