ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Effectiveness of Biodentine v/s Calcium Hydroxide as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials

Z

Zahoor khan

Status

Completed

Conditions

Reversible Pulpitis

Treatments

Procedure: Biodentine - Indirect Pulp Capping
Procedure: Calcium Hydroxide - Indirect Pulp Capping

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07147036
Dental/HITEC/IRB/41

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of Biodentine and Calcium Hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in mature permanent teeth with reversible pulpitis. A total of 76 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Outcomes were assessed over 12 weeks based on pain, periapical radiolucency, and PDL widening. The goal was to determine which material better preserves pulp vitality

Full description

Introduction:

Preservation of pulp vitality is critical for the long-term health and functionality of teeth. The pulp can be compromised due to caries, trauma, or iatrogenic factors. One conservative treatment to preserve pulp vitality in teeth with deep carious lesions and reversible pulpitis is indirect pulp capping (IPC).

Traditionally, Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) has been the gold standard material for IPC due to its antibacterial properties and its ability to stimulate the formation of reparative dentin. However, it has several limitations such as poor bonding to dentin, high solubility, and low mechanical strength, which may affect long-term success.

Biodentine, a newer bioactive dentin substitute, has emerged as a potential alternative due to its biocompatibility, bioactivity, antibacterial effect, good sealing ability, and high compressive strength. These properties suggest Biodentine may offer superior clinical outcomes in preserving pulp vitality when used as an indirect pulp capping material.

Objective:

To compare the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of Biodentine versus Calcium Hydroxide as indirect pulp capping agents in mature permanent teeth with reversible pulpitis.

Study Design:

Type: Experimental comparative study

Setting: Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, HITEC-IMS, Taxila

Duration: 1 year (after IRB approval)

Sample Size: 76 patients (38 in each group), calculated using WHO sample size calculator

Sampling Technique: Non-probability consecutive sampling

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 20-45 years

Teeth with occlusal carious lesions with ICDAS radiographic score RC-5

Vital teeth with signs of reversible pulpitis

No signs of root resorption

Exclusion Criteria:

Teeth tender to percussion

Irreversible pulpitis or non-vital pulp

Medically compromised or pregnant patients

Third molars or teeth with pulp exposure during caries excavation

Materials Used:

Group I: Biodentine (Septodont, France)

Group II: Calcium Hydroxide (Dycal)

Base Material: Self-cure Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji, Japan)

Final Restoration: Light-cure composite resin

Disinfectant: 0.2% Chlorhexidine

Vitality Tests: Cold test and electric pulp test

Caries Removal: Round bur (#BR-45) under copious water spray

Isolation: Rubber dam

Procedure:

Pre-operative Steps:

Informed consent obtained

Patient assessment: history, clinical examination, vitality testing, radiographs

Operative Steps:

Group I (Biodentine):

Caries removed and cavity prepared

Biodentine mixed per manufacturer's instructions and placed

After 1 week, a GIC base applied

Final composite restoration placed

Post-op radiograph taken

Group II (Calcium Hydroxide):

Caries removed and cavity dried

0.5 mm Dycal applied and allowed to set (2-3 min)

GIC base placed immediately afterward

Final composite restoration after 1 week

Post-op radiograph taken

Follow-Up Intervals:

2 weeks

6 weeks

12 weeks

Evaluation Criteria:

Clinical Parameters:

Pain (reversible or persistent)

Tenderness to percussion

Response to pulp vitality tests

Radiographic Parameters:

Presence or absence of periapical radiolucency

Periodontal ligament (PDL) space widening

Data Collection Tool:

Data was recorded using a structured proforma (Annexure-C), documenting all clinical and radiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up intervals.

Statistical Analysis:

Software: SPSS Version 26

Quantitative Variables: Mean ± standard deviation (e.g., age, weight)

Qualitative Variables: Frequency and percentage (e.g., pain, radiographic changes)

Test Used: Chi-square test

Level of Significance: p < 0.05 considered statistically significant

Ethical Considerations:

Approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) and College Ethical Committee

Written informed consent obtained in both English and Urdu

Patient confidentiality strictly maintained

Participants allowed to withdraw at any time without affecting treatment

Budget and Funding:

Funded by Dental College, HITEC-IMS, Taxila

No financial burden on participants

Estimated duration for study completion: 1 year

Expected Outcome:

The study aims to determine whether Biodentine, with its superior physical and biological properties, provides better clinical and radiographic outcomes in indirect pulp capping procedures compared to Calcium Hydroxide in mature permanent teeth.

Enrollment

76 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study:

  • Age: 20 to 45 years.
  • Tooth Type: Mature permanent teeth (maxillary or mandibular).
  • Caries Status: Occlusal carious lesions without previous restorations.
  • Pulpal Diagnosis: Reversible pulpitis confirmed by:
  • Patient history and clinical examination
  • Positive response to thermal (cold) and electric pulp tests
  • No tenderness to percussion
  • Radiographic Assessment: Carious lesion corresponding to ICDAS radiographic score RC-5.
  • Periapical Status: No signs of periapical radiolucency or root resorption on radiograph.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following:
  • Teeth exhibiting signs of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
  • Tenderness to percussion on clinical examination.
  • Pulp exposure during caries removal.
  • Systemic conditions that may interfere with healing or immune response, including:

Chronic systemic illness

Immunocompromised status

Pregnancy

-Third molars (due to anatomical and treatment variability)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

76 participants in 2 patient groups

Biodentine Group
Experimental group
Description:
Participants receive Biodentine as the indirect pulp capping material
Treatment:
Procedure: Biodentine - Indirect Pulp Capping
Calcium Hydroxide Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants receive Calcium Hydroxide (Dycal) as the indirect pulp capping material
Treatment:
Procedure: Calcium Hydroxide - Indirect Pulp Capping

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems