Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The investigators plan to compare the incidence of successful placement of epidural pain catheters versus paracostal catheters for the control of pain and prevention of pulmonary complications for adult trauma patients with blunt chest wall trauma resulting in multiple rib fractures. When a trauma patient has > or = to 3 rib fractures on the same side, is being admitted to the Surgical ICU, and is encountered within 72 hours from the time of their injury, they will be eligible for the study. If they (or a proxy) choose to participate, consent will be obtained and they will randomly be assigned to receive either an epidural or paracostal catheter for pain control. The aim of the study is to determine if paracostal catheters are noninferior to epidurals for controlling pain in multisystem trauma patients. Secondarily the investigators will evaluate success and time of placement of the assigned intervention and follow the patient throughout their hospital course to compare the success of analgesia provided by each modality along with any complications and/or benefits of the two types of catheters.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient allergy to local anesthetics
Patient refusal
Inability to consent for any reason
Prisoners
Age < 18
Pregnant women (pregnancy screen performed as part of routine trauma admission labs)
Absolute contraindications for either thoracic epidural or paracostal pain catheter placement which include:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
36 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal