Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) With the Combination of Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) in the Management of Postoperative Sternotomy Pain in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy

Bursa Uludag University

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Postoperative Pain; Cardiac Surgery; Pain Management; Acute Pain; Sternotomy Pain

Treatments: Procedure: Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIPB); Procedure: Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB); Procedure: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07472296

25-AKD-251

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two regional anesthesia techniques in managing pain for participants undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. The investigators will evaluate whether the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) or a combination of the Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) provides better pain control and recovery outcomes.

Full description

The investigators aim to compare the effects of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the combination of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in the management of postoperative sternotomy pain among participants scheduled for cardiac surgery via sternotomy.

Study design and methods: A total of 50 participants (aged 18-80, ASA I-III) scheduled for sternotomy will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

ESPB Group: Participants receive the Erector Spinae Plane Block. SPIPB + SAPB Group: Participants receive a combination of both blocks. Prior to the induction of general anesthesia, participants are randomized into two groups: the ESPB group and the SPIPB + SAPB group. Nerve blocks are performed in both groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest and during coughing, intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative behavioral pain scores, extubation times, and time to the first rescue analgesic requirement are evaluated.

Enrollment: 50 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
• Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III.
• Patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.
• Patients who have provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

• Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.
• Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m².
• Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine).
• Suspected coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
• Infection at the site of the regional block injection.
• Severe hepatic or renal failure.
• Severe neurological or psychiatric disorders.
• Emergency surgical procedures.
• Re-operation cases (Redo-surgery)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Erector Spinae Plane Block Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Participants in this group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia.

Treatment:

Procedure: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)

SPIPB and SAPB Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Participants in this group will receive a combination of bilateral ultrasound-guided Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) for postoperative analgesia.

Treatment:

Procedure: Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB)

Procedure: Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block (SPIPB)