Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is being carried out to assess equivalence of scar outcome for two absorbable sutures used for wound closure on the face in dermatologic surgery: rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 (VicrylRapide™) and fast-absorbing plain gut (5-0 fast). This is important because absorbable sutures are commonly used in Mohs surgery for epidermal closure, yet there is no evidence indicating if any of the sutures above allow for a better cosmetic outcome (less erythema, edema, and scarring).
Full description
Prospective randomized controlled split-scar observer-blinded study.
After dermatologic surgery on the face, surgeons have a choice between using non-absorbable or absorbable sutures for skin closure. A dermatologic surgeon favoring absorbable sutures for wound closure will consider many factors in material selection, including ease of manipulation, cost, and absorption time. However, there have been no randomized trials comparing the most important measure: aesthetic/cosmetic outcome.
Study endpoint/outcome: use three validated scar assessment tools.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Luiz C Pantalena, MD, PhD; David M Zloty, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal