ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of First Attempt Success in Nasotracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Videolaryngoscope vs. Flexible Bronchoscope

Seoul National University logo

Seoul National University

Status

Invitation-only

Conditions

Intubation Complication

Treatments

Device: Macintosh videolaryngoscope
Device: Flexible bronchoscope

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06964295
2503-041-1621

Details and patient eligibility

About

Participants are randomly assigned to two groups: one group undergoes nasotracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope, while the other group undergoes nasotracheal intubation using a flexible bronchoscope. The primary outcome is the first-attempt success rate, assessed at the time of tracheal tube placement. Additional outcomes include the degree of subglottic injury upon extubation, and the incidence and severity of sore throat and hoarseness at 1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively, as well as overall intubation success rates.

Enrollment

74 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

19+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 19 years or older
  • Undergoing ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • History of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • History of surgery or radiation therapy involving the upper airway
  • Presence of severely loose teeth

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

74 participants in 2 patient groups

Videolaryngoscope Group
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Macintosh videolaryngoscope
Flexible Bronchoscope Group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Flexible bronchoscope

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

KYUNG WON SHIN

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems