Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This retrospective study evaluates the effects of two different administration methods of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, and recovery in patients undergoing hip surgery.
All patients in the study received:
The study compares two groups:
Both groups received the same total volume of local anesthetic over 24 hours. All PENG blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. This study aims to determine whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion PENG block administration leads to better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and improved recovery outcomes.
Full description
Postoperative pain management after hip surgery remains a critical factor in recovery quality, opioid consumption, and overall patient outcomes. Among regional anesthesia techniques, the PENG Block is increasingly utilized for pain control due to its ability to provide effective analgesia while minimizing systemic opioid use. However, the optimal administration method of PENG block remains unclear.
This retrospective cohort study evaluates the effectiveness of two different PENG block administration techniques in patients undergoing hip surgery:
Total local anesthetic volume over 24 hours was equal in both groups.
Study Objectives:
The primary objective is to compare intermittent bolus vs. continuous infusion PENG block administration in terms of:
Secondary outcomes include:
This study aims to provide evidence on whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion leads to better pain relief, reduced opioid consumption, and improved recovery in hip surgery patients.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study:
Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
82 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal