Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
There have been studies reporting that combined spinal-epidural (CSE) with fentanyl and bupivacaine produce fetal bradycardia, (M.Kuczkowski, 2004) (Abrão K, 2009 ). It is unknown whether any differences in risk exist between fentanyl and bupivacaine when used as a part of the CSE procedure. Some authors have reported cases of parturients who developed uterine hyperactivity and fetal bradycardia after subarachnoid administration of fentanyl during labor. (D'Angelo & Eisenach, 1997) (Friedlander JD, 1997). It has been suggested that uterine hypertonus, leading to non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracings, might be an etiologic factor in these situations. (Landau, 2002).
We propose this study to test the hypothesis that administration of epidural fentanyl is associated with a lower incidence of fetal bradycardia compared to intrathecal fentanyl.
Full description
After approval by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent, we plan to prospectively study pregnant patients who undergo neuraxial labor analgesia. All patients will receive combined-spinal-epidural analgesia. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups by means of sealed envelope technique. Group A will receive a spinal dose of preservative-free fentanyl 25 mcg. Group B will receive one dose of spinal preservative-free 0.25% bupivacaine. Group C will receive a spinal combination of preservative-free 0.25% bupivacaine and fentanyl 25 mcg. Group D will receive spinal preservative-free 0.25% bupivacaine and epidural fentanyl 100 mcg. After the procedure, we will monitor the fetal heart rate and tocometry tracings for 20 min. Thereafter, an epidural infusion with a solution containing 0.125% bupivacaine and 2mcg/mL of fentanyl will be started. We will record demographic variables (age, and BMI), obstetric variables (parity, gestational age, cervical dilation, oxytocin infusion) and anesthetic variables (level of insertion of epidural catheter).
Primary outcomes:
Fetal heart rate (baseline, minimal and abnormal patterns)
Secondary outcomes:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
558 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Alexander R Rocuts Martinez, MD; Efrain Riveros Perez, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal