Comparison of ISQ in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Regenerated Bone

European University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Implant Site Reaction

Treatments: Procedure: sinus lift; Device: resonance frequency analysis

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06146244

CIPI/18/008

Details and patient eligibility

About

Compare ISQ values of implants placed in antral area in native bone vs regenerated bone with a follow-up at 3 months to compare values changes.

Full description

The stability of dental implants is influenced by the type of bone in which the implant is placed. Native bone tends to provide better initial stability due to its density and quality, while regenerated bone, it is logical to think that it may present less stability due to the quality of the generated bone and the presence of defects in the treated area.

In this study it has been observed that after 3 months more stability is observed in the antral area, measured in ISQ resonance frequency in implants on regenerated bone, which surprises us and this result is explained in detail in said study.

Enrollment: 132 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 23 to 85 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adult patients
• Total superior edentulism or antral zone edentulism
• Accepted study and signed inform consent

Exclusion criteria

• Patients under 23 years old
• Non accepted study or signed inform consent

Trial design

132 participants in 2 patient groups

Native bone

Description:

the evolution of the SSI and its change after 3 months of placing the implant in native bone in the antral area

Treatment:

Device: resonance frequency analysis

Regenerated Bone

Description:

the evolution of the SSI and its change after 3 months of placing the implant in regenerated bone in the antral area

Treatment:

Device: resonance frequency analysis

Procedure: sinus lift