ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of IV Analgesia, Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, and ESP Block for Chronic Pain After Open Heart Surgery (TEA-ESPB-IV)

K

Karadeniz Technical University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Postoperative Analgesia
Open Heart Surgery
Chronic Postoperative Pain
Analgesia

Treatments

Other: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
Other: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
Other: Intravenous Analgesia

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07257744
KTU-ANES-CHRONICPAIN-2024-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

This prospective observational study aims to compare three routinely used postoperative analgesia techniques in patients undergoing open heart surgery: intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of these analgesia modalities on the development of chronic postoperative pain at 3 months. Secondary objectives include assessing postoperative acute pain scores, additional analgesic requirements, extubation time, mobilization time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, respiratory complications, and the relationship between acute and chronic pain. No intervention is assigned by protocol, and all analgesia methods are applied as part of routine clinical practice.

Full description

This prospective observational study is designed to evaluate and compare three commonly used postoperative analgesia modalities in adult patients undergoing open heart surgery through median sternotomy: intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB). All analgesia techniques included in this study represent routine clinical practices performed by the anesthesia team, and no intervention is assigned according to a research protocol. Patients receive whichever analgesia method is chosen by the clinical anesthesia team based on individual clinical conditions. Thus, the study reflects real-world practice in a single tertiary cardiac surgery center.

The primary objective is to determine the effect of these analgesia methods on the development of chronic postoperative pain at 3 months following surgery. Chronic pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the S-LANSS questionnaire, administered either via telephone or in-person follow-up. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of postoperative acute pain scores, additional analgesic consumption, extubation time, mobilization time, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, respiratory parameters, complications such as reintubation or need for non-invasive mechanical ventilation, bronchodilator use, sedation requirements, urine output, and perioperative hemodynamic stability. The study also aims to analyze the correlation between acute postoperative pain and subsequent chronic pain development.

Eligible patients are those aged 18-85 years, classified as ASA I-III, with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg/m², and scheduled for open heart surgery at Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital. Exclusion criteria include coagulation disorders, infection at the intervention site, psychiatric disorders, chronic pain treatment, allergy to anesthetic agents, inability to cooperate or communicate, prior open heart surgery, chronic analgesic or antidepressant use, and significant comorbid conditions affecting participation.

Patients included in the study will have their perioperative data extracted from anesthesia records, ICU follow-up forms, and hospital medical charts. Routine postoperative pain measurements will be performed using the NRS. No additional procedures, medications, or interventions beyond routine care will be conducted.

The study aims to enroll 90 patients (30 per group). Data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Normality will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Parametric and nonparametric tests, including Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square test, repeated-measures ANOVA, and Friedman test, will be used as appropriate. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be accepted.

This study is expected to contribute to the understanding of analgesic strategies in cardiac surgery and their role in preventing chronic postoperative pain, improving recovery, and reducing complications.

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 85 years
  • Classified as ASA physical status I-III
  • Scheduled to undergo open heart surgery with median sternotomy
  • BMI < 35 kg/m²
  • Able to understand and provide written informed consent
  • Eligible to receive any of the routine analgesia methods (intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia, or erector spinae plane block)

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 or > 85 years
  • BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Infection at the intervention site
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or induction agents
  • Psychiatric disorders limiting cooperation
  • Use of chronic pain medications, antidepressants, corticosteroids, antiepileptics, or routine analgesics
  • Inability to cooperate, communicate, or follow commands
  • Physical or verbal performance impairment
  • Previous open heart surgery

Trial design

90 participants in 3 patient groups

Intravenous Analgesia Group (IV)
Description:
Participants who receive routine postoperative intravenous analgesia (opioid and/or non-opioid medications) as determined by the clinical anesthesia team. No protocol-assigned intervention is applied; analgesia is selected based on routine clinical practice.
Treatment:
Other: Intravenous Analgesia
Other: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
Other: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Group (TEA)
Description:
Participants who receive thoracic epidural analgesia via an epidural catheter placed preoperatively for postoperative pain control. TEA is administered according to institutional routine practice and is not assigned by the study protocol
Treatment:
Other: Intravenous Analgesia
Other: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
Other: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
Erector Spinae Plane Block Group (ESPB)
Description:
Participants who receive bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed preoperatively for postoperative analgesia. This block is a routine clinical procedure and is not assigned or modified by the study protocol.
Treatment:
Other: Intravenous Analgesia
Other: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
Other: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ali AKDOGAN, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems