ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.

C

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Status

Completed

Conditions

General Anesthesia

Treatments

Procedure: Tracheal intubation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01007370
NM 2010-001

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators aim to compare two different types of supraglottic devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Our hypothesis is that the use of the I-gel supraglottic airway will result in a higher first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation.

Full description

Supraglottic airway devices such as LMA-Fastrach and I-gel provide patent airways during general anesthesia.

The LMA-Fastrach is designed to provide a conduit for blind or fiberoptically guided tracheal intubations. However, the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt through this device varies between 50 and 87%.

The I-gel is a newer device for airway management which, with its wide bore, allows direct passage of a tracheal tube. Recent studies suggest that the I-gel is easy to insert and that limited experience is needed before a high success insertion rate is obtained.

In this prospective and randomized study, we will evaluate the performance of both devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Enrollment

160 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and older
  • ASA physical status 1-3
  • Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • ASA physical status 4-5
  • Contraindications to muscle relaxation
  • Anticipated or known difficult intubation or ventilation
  • Patients with limited mouth opening (less than 2 cm)
  • Patients at increased risk of aspiration, or having an history of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux or hiatal hernia.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

160 participants in 2 patient groups

LMA-Fastrach
Active Comparator group
Description:
* Induction of general anesthesia with 1,5-2,5 mg/kg propofol and 1-3 mcg/kg fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxation with 0,6 mg/kg of rocuronium. * Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification * Insertion of LMA-Fastrach (sizes 3,4 or 5), establishment of ventilation * Evaluation of glottic view through LMA-Fastrach using fibrescope (one out of ten patients) * Tracheal intubation through the LMA-Fastrach * With the endotracheal tube in place, the anaesthesiologist will proceed to the removal of supraglottic device
Treatment:
Procedure: Tracheal intubation
Procedure: Tracheal intubation
I-gel
Active Comparator group
Description:
* Induction of general anesthesia with 1,5-2,5 mg/kg propofol and 1-3 mcg/kg fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxation with 0,6 mg/kg of rocuronium. * Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification * Insertion of I-gel (sizes 3,4 or 5), establishment of ventilation * Evaluation of glottic view through I-gel using fibrescope (one out of ten patients) * Tracheal intubation through the I-gel * With the endotracheal tube in place, the anaesthesiologist will proceed to the removal of supraglottic device
Treatment:
Procedure: Tracheal intubation
Procedure: Tracheal intubation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems