ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrest

Treatments

Device: Automatic CPR machine

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00308815
9361701098

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

Sex

All

Ages

16+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric
  • Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team

Exclusion criteria

  • Younger than 15 years old
  • Traumatic cardia arrest
  • Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems