ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Niel-Asher and Spencer Techniques in Frozen Shoulder Patients

R

Riphah International University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder
Adhesive Capsulitis

Treatments

Other: Spencer Technique
Other: Niel-Asher Technique

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07080060
REC/RCR & AHS/24/0167- Minahil

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques-Niel-Asher Technique and Spencer Technique-when combined with conventional physiotherapy in treating patients with frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis). Frozen shoulder is a painful condition that limits movement and function of the shoulder joint. The study will include 44 adults aged 35 to 65 years who have been diagnosed with stage II frozen shoulder. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive standard physiotherapy, including heat therapy, TENS, and stretching exercises. In addition, one group will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, while the other group will receive the Spencer Technique. Pain, range of motion, and shoulder function will be measured before and after a 4-week treatment period using validated tools such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a goniometer, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The goal is to determine which manual therapy technique is more effective in improving symptoms and function in patients with frozen shoulder.

Full description

Frozen shoulder, also known as adhesive capsulitis, is a common musculoskeletal condition characterised by pain, stiffness, and reduced range of motion of the glenohumeral joint. It is often associated with idiopathic onset, and can significantly impair daily activities and quality of life. While conventional physiotherapy-including modalities such as heat, TENS, and therapeutic exercise-forms the basis of treatment, there is growing evidence supporting the use of manual therapy techniques for enhanced outcomes.

This randomised controlled trial investigates the comparative effects of the Niel-Asher Technique and the Spencer Technique, each provided alongside standard conventional physiotherapy. A total of 44 patients meeting inclusion criteria (age 35-65 years, diagnosed with stage II adhesive capsulitis, and VAS pain score <7/10) will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups using computer-generated numbers and sealed envelope allocation.

Group A will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, which targets trigger points and myofascial release to reduce muscle guarding and pain. Group B will receive the Spencer Technique, a structured sequence of mobilisation techniques often used in osteopathic manual therapy. Both groups will also receive conventional therapy including moist heat, TENS, Codman exercises, finger ladder exercises, and capsular stretching.

The intervention will be administered three times per week over a 4-week period. Primary outcome measures include shoulder pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), range of motion measured by a universal goniometer, and functional status assessed by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

Data will be analysed using SPSS 25.0. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied based on data distribution. The findings of this study aim to provide evidence for clinical decision-making in the manual therapy treatment of frozen shoulder and may help establish more effective, hands-on techniques in physiotherapy practice.

Enrollment

44 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

35 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 35-65 years diagnosed with primary Adhesive Capsulitis.
  • Both gender male and female.
  • Both Active and passive Range of Motion is limited.
  • Stage II Frozen Shoulder patients (Freezing Stage,3-9 months).
  • More than 50% of range of motion is limited in Flexion, Abduction and External rotation as compared to unaffected side.
  • Pain reported on VAS score <7/10 in shoulder region.
  • Patients agree to sign written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with systemic illness:
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Thyroid disorders.
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis, Malignancy.
  • Patients with mechanical injuries like:
  • Rotator Cuff injury, Ligamentous Injuries.23
  • Previous Surgery or Manipulation under Anesthesia.
  • Patients with Stage I, III, IV of Frozen Shoulder.
  • Patient reported with VAS score >7/10 in shoulder region.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

44 participants in 2 patient groups

Niel-Asher Technique
Experimental group
Description:
Participants in this group will receive the Niel-Asher Technique, a manual therapy approach focusing on trigger point release and myofascial decompression of the shoulder girdle. Treatment will involve structured pressure techniques applied to specific muscular trigger points including the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis, and levator scapulae. The intervention will be delivered in side-lying and sitting positions.
Treatment:
Other: Niel-Asher Technique
Spencer Technique
Experimental group
Description:
Participants in this group will receive the Spencer Technique, an osteopathic manual therapy consisting of eight mobilization steps: extension, flexion, circumduction with compression, circumduction with distraction, abduction, adduction with external rotation, internal rotation, and traction stretch. Each movement will be performed with patient participation using muscle energy techniques.
Treatment:
Other: Spencer Technique

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Amna Zia, Phd Scholar; Samrood Akram, Phd Scholar

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems