ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Nipple-areolar Complex Sensation According to Incision Types in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

Y

Yonsei University Health System (YUHS)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Breast Cancer
Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Treatments

Biological: Nipple sparing mastecomy with different incision placements

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05917834
3-2019-0235

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to assess nipple areolar complex sensation after nipple sparing mastectomy and compare the results according to different incisional approaches; specifically, inframammary fold (IMF) versus peri-areolar/radial. One-hundred-and-five post NSM patients from Oct 2019 to Nov 2021 have been recruited prospectively and evaluated for NAC sensory. A total of 97 patients (IMF 65 and peri-areolar/radial 32) were included in the analyses for comparison during follow up from 24 to 48 months after surgery. It was hypothesized that patients with IMF would have better outcomes for NAC senroy.

Enrollment

105 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Females who are older than 18
  2. Patients who underwent nipple sparing mastectomy in Gangnam Severance Hospital

Exclusion criteria

  1. Loss or excision of NAC due to post-surgical necrosis
  2. Diagnosis of other conditions that may interfere with cutaneous sensation

Trial design

105 participants in 2 patient groups

Imframammary
Description:
Imframammary- NSM using imframammary incision
Treatment:
Biological: Nipple sparing mastecomy with different incision placements
Radial/Peri-areolar
Description:
Radial/Peri-areolar- NSM using Radial/Peri-areolar incision
Treatment:
Biological: Nipple sparing mastecomy with different incision placements

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems