Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The investigators hypothesize that the orbital atherectomy system (OAS), a newer generation atherectomy device, reduces the incidence of microcirculatory compromise as compared to older generation rotational atherectomy (RA) due to differences in the mechanism of athero-ablation.
Full description
The presence of heavily calcified coronary lesions necessitates the use of ablative devices that aid in successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, atherectomy devices generate microparticles that embolize to the distal coronary microcirculation and may compromise myocardial tissue perfusion.
Two mechanisms that deserve particular attention are the eccentric mounting of the OAS crown and the higher flow rates on the vasodilator flush. Firstly, as opposed to rotational atherectomy where the larger, centrally mounted burr may cause obstruction of flow during the atherectomy, the smaller eccentrically mounted crown in OAS allows continuous perfusion during both atherectomy as well as rest periods. Second, both during rest and atherectomy, the flow rates of vasodilatory flush is higher in OAS compared to RA. Combined, these differences in coronary and vasodilator flush flow could lead to improved perfusion of the distal circulation, particularly during the atherectomy runs when risk of embolization is highest.
The loss of microcirculatory function can be transient, with partial or complete restoration of microcirculatory blood flow, or permanent. As shown in studies of patients with acute coronary syndromes, the loss of microcirculatory function is a critical and independent predictor of myocardial recovery and adverse outcomes. The putative protective effects of OAS on coronary microvasculature may therefore be of major clinical significance and impact.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Age ≥ 18 years
Patient with an indication for PCI including:
Patients will undergo cardiac catheterization and possible or definite PCI with intent to stent using any non-investigational metallic drug-eluting stent (DES)
Signed written informed consent
Heavily calcified (severe)lesions necessitating atherectomy.
Angiographic inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
General Inclusion - MRI Sub-Study
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
General Inclusion - MRI Sub-Study
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal