Comparison of Piezoelectric Split-crest Technique Versus Expansion Using Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in Treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

ahmed ashraf abdelreheem

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Treatments: Device: piezoelectric

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05141331

27721

Details and patient eligibility

About

Comparison of Piezoelectric split-crest technique versus expansion using Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Enrollment: 28 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Participants are free from any systemic diseases.
• Participant have missing one or two premolars or molars with sufficient alveolar ridge height and insufficient alveolar ridge buccolingual (BL) width that interfere with conventional straight forward implant placement.
• The minimum BL ridge width included in the study will be 3.5 mm to facilitate ridge splitting and expansion

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with residual infections in the edentulous areas.
• Medically compromised groups.
• Smokers and patients with poor oral hygiene.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

28 participants in 2 patient groups

Piezoelectric split-crest technique in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Experimental group

Description:

Piezoelectric split-crest technique in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Treatment:

Device: piezoelectric

Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Active Comparator group

Description:

Hand Driven Ridge Expanders in treatment of Maxillary Narrow Ridges

Treatment:

Device: piezoelectric