ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Post-pinal Cord Injury (SCI) Locomotor Training Techniques

University of Miami logo

University of Miami

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3
Phase 2

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Treatments

Other: Locomotor training

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT01095380
R01HD041487

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background: Body weight supported (BWS) locomotor training improves overground walking ability in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). While there are various approaches available for locomotor training, there is no consensus regarding which of these is optimal. The purpose of this ongoing investigation is to compare outcomes associated with these different training approaches.

Subjects and Methods: Subjects with chronic motor-incomplete SCI have completed training and initial and final testing. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different BWS assisted-stepping groups, including: 1) treadmill training with manual assistance (TM), 2) treadmill training with stimulation (TS), 3) overground training with stimulation (OG), or 4) treadmill training with robotic assistance (LR). Prior to and following participation the investigators assessed:

  • Walking-related outcome measures: overground walking speed, training speed, step length and step symmetry.
  • Spinal cord reflex activity
  • Electromyographic (EMG) associated with walking

Hypotheses:

In individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI):

  1. A 12-week period of body weight supported treadmill training with TS will produce improvements in walking function that are significantly greater than those produced by training with TM, OG, LR.
  2. TS training will be associated with greater changes to spinal reflex activity than will be observed in subjects trained with manual assistance or non-assisted stepping. Changes to spinal reflex activation will be such that this activity more closely resembles that observed in non-disabled (ND) individuals.
  3. Following participation in this walking regimen, EMG activity observed during walking in all groups will be more robust, more consistent and better coordinated than EMG measures obtained prior to training.

Enrollment

74 patients

Sex

All

Ages

16 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (AIS C or D)
  • at least one year post injury
  • able to step with at at least one leg
  • able to stand from chair with no more than moderate assist of 1 person

Exclusion criteria

  • unstable neurologic status
  • active orthopedic problem

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

74 participants in 4 patient groups

Treadmill training - manual assist (TM)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants in the TM group received partial body weight support unilateral or bilateral manual assistance from a trainer for stepping
Treatment:
Other: Locomotor training
Treadmill training - electrical stimulation (TS)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants in the TS group received partial body weight support and bilateral functional electrical stimulation to assist stepping
Treatment:
Other: Locomotor training
Overground Training (OG)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Training over ground with body weight support and electrical stimulation for dorsiflex assistance
Treatment:
Other: Locomotor training
Treadmill training - locomat robot (LR)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Treadmill training with partical body weight support and assistance of a robotic gait orthosis for stepping
Treatment:
Other: Locomotor training

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems