ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of QoR-15 in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine

Seoul National University logo

Seoul National University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Quality of Recovery
Sugammadex
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Neostigmine
Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent

Treatments

Drug: Sugammadex
Drug: Neostigmine

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04332627
B-1910/571-004

Details and patient eligibility

About

The quality of recovery in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using Sumamadex and Neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared through the QoR(Quality of Recovery)-15 questionnaire.

Full description

Quality of Recovery questionnaire includes five details (Emotional status, Physical comfort, Physiological support, Physical independece, Pain), and is a proven method of reliability, consistency and validity for evaluating recovery from surgery and anesthesia.

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients experience various discomforts such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and placebo due to general anesthesia.

Neostigmine has side effects such as crampy abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. In addition, residual neuromuscular blockade was higher in neostigmine compared with sugammadex.

Although sugammadex expected to improve patient's recovery, it is still controversial that sugammadex contributes to clinically meaningfull difference compared with neostigmine.

Therefore, the aim of our study is comparison of quality of recovery through QoR-15 questionnaire in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using sugammadex and neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Enrollment

77 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy aged 20-70

Exclusion criteria

  • neuromuscular disease
  • allergy to rocuronium, sugammadex, neostigmine
  • cognitive impairment ( disable to answer the questionnaire )
  • refuse to participate

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

77 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

sugammadex
Active Comparator group
Description:
sugammadex 2mg/kg or 4mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : 4mg/kg, TOF 1-4 : 2mg/kg)
Treatment:
Drug: Sugammadex
neostigmine
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
with glycopyrrolate 0.4mg, neostigmine 0.02mg/kg or 0.04mg/kg or 0.05mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : wait until TOF 2, TOF2-3: 0.05mg/kg, TOF4: 0.04mg/kg)
Treatment:
Drug: Neostigmine

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems