ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)

University of Michigan logo

University of Michigan

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Prematurity
Acute Respiratory Deficiency
Assisted Ventilation

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02032511
HUM00073557

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and ease of use of two commonly used NCPAP interfaces: the RAM NC and the Infant Flow prongs and nasal mask.

Enrollment

19 patients

Sex

All

Ages

Under 6 months old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • less than or equal to 7 kg
  • order for nasal continuous positive pressure

Exclusion criteria

  • patients greater than 7kg
  • patients that do not have informed consent

Trial design

19 participants in 2 patient groups

RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems