Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Periodontal disease is a multifactorial inflammatory disease of infectious origin. The last epidemiological study concerning periodontitis in France was carried out in 2002-2003 by Bourgeois et al and shows that 95.4% of the patients have a loss of attachment and 82.23% have associated periodontal pockets. The presence of bacteria, mostly Gram-negative anaerobes, is not sufficient to explain the heterogeneity of clinical forms. Indeed, there are different risk factors influencing the frequency and severity of periodontitis.
Moreover, the link between systemic pathologies and periodontitis has been widely established: it concerns metabolic syndromes, cardiovascular pathologies, premature pregnancies, autoimmune diseases and Alzheimer disease.
Some research has been done on biomarkers found in periodontitis. Among them, the investigators quote the study which took place within the laboratory of Biochemistry - Clinical Proteomics of Pr Lehmann Sylvain by Mertens et al. It is the only study to date that has established an LC-MRM proteomic profile characteristic of periodontitis: indeed, 4 proteins of plasma origin were highlighted thanks to this technology: hemopexin (HEMO), plasminogen (PLMN), apolipoprotein H and α-fibrinogen (FIBA) were correlated with the presence of periodontitis compared to the control group (p<0.05).
Full description
Periodontitis can be defined as a multi-factorial infectious disease, initiated by the accumulation of bacterial biofilm on the dental surfaces and causing the destruction of the supporting tissues of the tooth, which can lead to the loss of the dental organ. The high prevalence of these pathologies in the general population makes them an important subject to be considered in public health. This prevalence varies from 56 to 82%. The last epidemiological study in France carried out in 2002-2003 shows that 95.4% of patients have a loss of attachment and 82.23% have associated periodontal pockets. They are related to an imbalance between the microbiota and the host which will be more or less permissive with respect to the quantity and/or the bacterial quality. The presence of bacteria, mostly Gram-negative anaerobes, is not sufficient to explain the heterogeneity of clinical forms. Indeed, undetermined etiological factors create in some patients an environment favorable to the formation of periodontitis, in particular genetic and predisposing factors.
Periodontitis is characterized by variable clinical symptoms and signs that may include visible or non-visible inflammation, spontaneous or provoked gingival bleeding of varying severity, periodontal pocket formation related to attachment and alveolar bone loss, tooth mobility and may lead to tooth loss. In practice, the diagnosis is based on the new Chicago classification but the etiological diagnosis is not so simple with the clinical and radiological tools available today. Bacteriological tests exist to identify certain bacteria responsible for periodontitis, but here again these tests are not sufficiently effective and studies show that there is a significant risk of false positives and negatives.
Some research has been done on biomarkers found in periodontitis. The PubMed database includes a few articles on salivary biomarkers and periodontitis, including a systematic review dating from 2018. Among them, the investigators mention the study that took place in the laboratory of Biochemistry - Clinical Proteomics of Pr Lehmann Sylvain by Mertens et al. It is the only study to date that has established an LC-MRM proteomic profile characteristic of periodontitis: indeed 4 proteins of plasma origin were highlighted thanks to this technology: hemopexin (HEMO), plasminogen (PLMN), apolipoprotein H and α-fibrinogen (FIBA) were correlated to the presence of periodontitis compared to the control group (p<0.05).
However, this study is only interested in saliva. However, the proteins found are of plasma origin. The crevicular fluid (present in the sulcus) is a plasma exudate that is easy to collect. More and more studies are interested in this fluid. It would therefore be interesting to analyze it in parallel with saliva.
This assay of proteins in fluids can detect a maximum of 4 to 5 proteins in a multiplex assay, and requires prior knowledge of the proteins being sought. In order to open up the search for new biomarkers, quantification techniques using mass spectrometry coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography provide extensive qualitative and quantitative characterisation of the peptidome and epitranscriptome. Nowadays, with the DIA (Data Independent Acquisition) mode, multiplex detection can be extended to more than 1000 proteins in a single analysis, as shown in a recent study by Sato et al. The advantages of these techniques lie in their high specificity and sensitivity, enabling the detection of thousands of proteins and multiple RNA modifications in micro-samples (microlites).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Control Group:
Case Group:
Exclusion criteria
General:
Case Group:
Control Group:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
118 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Margaux Dr VIGNON; Valérie Dr ORTI
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal