ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Self-ligating Mico One and Conventional MBT Brackets Regarding Alignment Efficiency and Pain Experience- a Randomized Clinical Trial

S

Shoaib Rahim

Status

Completed

Conditions

Pain

Treatments

Other: self ligating brackets

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06895083
FF/FUMC/215-329Phy/23

Details and patient eligibility

About

The rate of Orthodontic tooth movement affects the efficacy and time duration of the treatment. One of the key factors, during the initial alignment phase, is the amount of the force that the arch-wire applies to the dentition. The amount of the applied force and the rate of tooth movement are directly proportional to the frictional resistance between the arch wire and bracket. The quality and degree of resistance is related to the physical characteristics of the arch wire, bracket material, arch wire dimensions, and the type of arch wire ligation. The estimated rate of tooth movement is about 0.35 to 2.04 mm per month, which is influenced by various factors and variables including the biological response of the individual to orthodontic forces, the complexity of the case, treatment mechanics and patient compliance throughout the course of treatment .

Full description

To compare the alignment efficiency and pain experience of Mico-one self-ligating and conventional ligating MBT pre-adjusted brackets in the initial alignment stage of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.CONVENTIONAL MBT BRACKETS: In conventional brackets elastic ligatures or metal ties are used to ligate the wire in the bracket slot. 2. SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS: Self-ligating brackets like conventional braces are placed relatively the same way.

The exception is that self-ligating braces don't use elastics, or metal ties. Instead it has special clips or brackets with a spring-loaded door. The brackets while maintaing pressure on the archwire, help move the teeth along it at a steady pace .[9] 3 .ALIGNMENT EFFICIENCY Movement of the teeth measured at four months interval. Scoring method involves measuring the linear distance between anatomical contact points between maxillary and mandibular incisors from adjacent tooth anatomical points. (Little's irregularity index)

4.PAIN Unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tooth movement will be measured as a mean using the VAS at 4 hours, 24 hours, day 3, day 7, 1 st Month, 2 nd Month, 3 rd Month and 4 th Month.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with Non extraction orthodontic treatment plan
  • Crowding of 3 to 6 mm according to Little's irregularity index
  • Both male and female patients
  • 14-20 years of age.
  • All permanent teeth present up to first permanent molar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Systemic disease
  • Patients with periodontally compromised teeth
  • Patient requiring Orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal discrepancies
  • Patients taking medications, like NSAIDs or other anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Cleft lip or palate
  • Hypodontia, or Hyperdontia

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

conventional
No Intervention group
Description:
Participants in this arm will conventional brackets
Experimental
Experimental group
Description:
Participants in this arm will self ligating brackets
Treatment:
Other: self ligating brackets

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems