ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of Self-Locking Versus Traditional Sutures in Double-Layer Laparoscopic Vaginal Vault Closure After Hysterectomy (BI-SURE Trial)

A

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Postoperative Complications
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence
Gynecologic Cancers

Treatments

Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Self-Locking Suture
Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Polyglactin 910

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07313839
415/2024/DISP/AOUPR

Details and patient eligibility

About

Vaginal vault closure after laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy may be associated with postoperative complications such as vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, and bleeding. The optimal suture material and technique for laparoscopic colporrhaphy, particularly in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies, remain controversial.

The BI-SURE trial is a multicenter, randomized controlled study designed to compare double-layer self-locking sutures versus double-layer traditional Polyglactin 910 sutures for laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy. The study aims to evaluate postoperative effectiveness and safety within three months after surgery.

Full description

Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy represent standard surgical approaches for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies but are associated with a higher risk of vaginal vault complications compared with open or vaginal surgery. Although uncommon, postoperative complications such as vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, and bleeding may lead to significant morbidity and require additional medical or surgical interventions.

Vaginal vault closure can be performed using different suturing techniques and materials. Traditional braided sutures, such as Polyglactin 910, are widely used in clinical practice, while self-locking (barbed) sutures have been introduced to facilitate laparoscopic suturing by maintaining tissue approximation without the need for knots. Evidence comparing these sutures is limited, particularly for double-layer closure techniques and in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies.

The BI-SURE trial is a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial designed to compare double-layer self-locking sutures versus double-layer traditional Polyglactin 910 sutures for laparoscopic vaginal vault closure following hysterectomy for malignant gynecologic disease. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Postoperative outcomes will be assessed up to three months after surgery, including vaginal cuff-related complications and postoperative pain.

Enrollment

310 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotically assisted hysterectomy for gynecologic malignant disease
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Laparotomic or vaginal hysterectomy
  • Contraindication to laparoscopic vaginal vault closure

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

310 participants in 2 patient groups

Self-Locking Suture Group
Experimental group
Description:
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy using a double-layer continuous suturing technique performed with a self-locking (barbed) suture, according to current clinical practice.
Treatment:
Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Self-Locking Suture
Traditional Suture Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo laparoscopic vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy using a double-layer continuous suturing technique performed with traditional braided Polyglactin 910 suture, according to current clinical practice.
Treatment:
Procedure: Double-Layer Vaginal Vault Closure with Polyglactin 910

Trial contacts and locations

5

Loading...

Central trial contact

Vito Andrea Capozzi

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems