ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparıson Of Sılıcone And Acrylıc Medıcal Adhesıve Tapes On Skın İnjury Nasogastrıc Tube

E

Ege University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Medical-adhesive; Skin Injury

Treatments

Other: medical adhesive tape

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06925347
EGE-HMF-EO-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted to compare the effects of silicone and acrylic medical adhesive tapes on medical-adhesive related skin injury in the fixation of nasogastric tubes in patients being monitored in intensive care.

Full description

This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted to compare the effects of silicone and acrylic medical adhesive tapes on medical-adhesive related skin injury in the fixation of nasogastric tubes in patients being monitored in intensive care.

The population of the research consisted of patients with nasogastric tubes who were hospitalized in the Neurology Intensive Care Unit of Ege University Hospital (Health Practice and Research Center) between the dates of 01.06.2022 and 31.12.2023. The sample of the study consisted of 76 patients who were hospitalized in the Neurology Intensive Care Unit during this date range, had a nasogastric tube inserted, complied with the limitations of the study and agreed to participate in the study. Patients were stratified according to their age groups and assigned to experimental and control groups by block randomisation technique.

The nasogastric tube of the patients in the control group was fixed with acrylic medical adhesive tape which is used in routine practice, and the nasogastric tube of the patients in the experimental group was fixed with silicone medical adhesive tape. Starting from these condday following the nasogastric tube insertion, the medical adhesive tape that enables the fixation of the nasogastric tube was removed by wetting it with a sterile tampon impregnated with distilled water, and the patient's nasal skin was observed for 10 minutes each time, during 7 days for the presence of erythema, edema, denudation, dryness, infection, and vesicles. Then, the same medical adhesive tape was applied again and the tube was fixed. The data were analyzed in SPSS 25.0 program. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact probability test were used to analyze the data. The nasogastric tube of the patients in the control group was fixed with acrylic medical adhesive tape which is used in routine practice, and the nasogastric tube of the patients in the experimental group was fixed with silicone medical adhesive tape.

Enrollment

76 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Feeding with a nasogastric tube
  • Being between the ages of 18-85
  • Voluntarily participating in the study
  • Having the first nasogastric tube inserted after admission to the Intensive Care Unit and having the tube detected by the researcher.

Exclusion criteria

  • Having any dermatological disease
  • Having a history of allergy
  • Having a lesion on the skin of the nose
  • Failure to detect the tube by the researcher when the first nasogastric tube was inserted after admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Screening

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

76 participants in 2 patient groups

Control group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Medical adhesive tape with hypoallergenic acrylic adhesive used in standard practice was used in the control group (n=38).
Treatment:
Other: medical adhesive tape
Experimental group
Experimental group
Description:
Silicone medical adhesive tape was used in the experimental group (n=38).
Treatment:
Other: medical adhesive tape

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems