Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Status: Completed

Conditions: Complication of Surgical Procedure; Surgical Injury; Bladder Injury; Ureter Injury

Treatments: Diagnostic Test: carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06278753

2025/05/02

Details and patient eligibility

About

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

Full description

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Enrollment: 540 patients

Sex: Female

Ages: 18 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients
2. The operation will be performed in our hospital
3. Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign
4. After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.

Exclusion criteria

1. Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies
2. malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings
3. Patients do not want to participate in the study

Trial design

540 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard cystoscopy

Description:

Standard cystoscopy arm

carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Description:

carbon dioxide cystoscopy arm

Treatment:

Diagnostic Test: carbon dioxide cystoscopy