Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Objective: To compare the application of oxelidine in postoperative analgesia after orthopedic lumbar spine surgery with morphine or sufentanil, and to explore the efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia.
Method: Researchers included 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical conditions I and III, aged 18 to 65 years, who were scheduled to undergo orthopedic lumbar general anesthesia surgery at an appropriate time. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 30 cases in each group: The oxeridine group (Group A), where a loading dose of 1.5mg of oxeridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01mg/kg-1.h-1 was connected. Oxeridine was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Morphine group (Group M), a loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Sufentanil group (Group S), a 4u loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was combined with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h.The resting and exercise VAS pain scores of the three groups of patients at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation and adverse reactions within 48 hours were recorded.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
90 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sun Ling Lu Sun Ling LU, Master's degree
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal