Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Endodontically Treated Molar

Treatments: Other: Resin Cement

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06787469

ANCU-8-1-2025

Details and patient eligibility

About

Cementation of indirect restoration is a determinant of the success or failure of the fabricated restoration and consequentially the entire tooth. While there are numerous commercially available resin cements in the dental market, not all have been sufficiently assessed with significant follow up periods to clinically determine their success or failure. As such, this research will be conducted to elucidate if there is a viability to the cementation of indirect hybrid ceramic blocks over endodontically treated teeth using bioactive self-adhesive resin cement and determining whether it provides a clinical advantage and improved restoration serviceability in the oral cavity.

Enrollment: 50 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 21 to 50 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patient Related Criteria:
• Adult patients (age: 21-50 years) of both genders.
• Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
• Willing to sign the informed consent.
• Accepts the follow-up period.

Tooth Related Criteria:

• Endodontically treated first and second permanent molars.
• Access cavities with one missing proximal wall i.e. Occluso-mesial/distal cavities
• Patients with proper oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

• Endodontically treated anterior, premolar and third molar teeth
• Badly broken-down teeth
• Hopelessly carious/destructed teeth necessitating extraction
• Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma.
• External or internal resorption.
• Cervical carious lesions
• Medically compromised patients
• Patients with known allergies to Latex and/or resinous material

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Quadruple Blind

---

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Indirect Restorations cemented using Coltene Solocem Resin Cement

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Other: Resin Cement

Other: Resin Cement

Indirect Restorations cemented using SHOFU BeautiLink Resin Cement

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Other: Resin Cement

Other: Resin Cement