Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of two different non-pharmacologic interventions with the control group in reducing pain due to peripheral intravenous catheterization application in children aged 5-12 years.
Hypotheses:
H1: Pain level differs in the group that received PIK with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group.
H2: The level of fear in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator differs from the control group.
H3: Satisfaction level is different in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group.
H4: The pain level differs in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group.
H5: The level of fear is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group.
H6: Satisfaction level is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group.
H7: Pain level is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group.
H8: The level of fear is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group.
H9: The satisfaction level in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator is different from the cartoon group.
H10: PIK application time is different in the palm stimulator group compared to the control group.
H11: PIK application time is different in the cartoon group compared to the co
Full description
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
(3) Not under the influence of sedative/anticonvulsant/analgesic drugs, (4) Pediatric patients aged 5-12 years, (5) Pediatric patients who can communicate, understand, and carry out commands and are not dependent on technological devices.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
90 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal