Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Web Fracture Liaison Service (e_FLS) to Fracture Liaison Services in France: the evAB Study (evAB)

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Status: Withdrawn

Conditions: Osteoporosis; Fracture

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05303350

APHP211339

2022-A00553-40 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture.

Full description

Osteoporotic fractures such as hip fractures and severe fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and impose a large financial burden on healthcare systems. Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures are at higher risk of subsequent fractures. Other severe fractures (pelvis, vertebrae, humerus) have similar consequences, pelvis. The risk of refracture after fracture depends on the time: it is 5 times higher in the first 2-3 years, and 2 times higher after. This notion of Imminent Fracture Risk is the basis for the development of post-fracture care pathways called "fracture liaison. The implementation of FLS is the most effective way to reduce the risk of secondary fracture. Despite their success, FLS programs are not an integral part of post-fracture care throughout the France. The investigators believe that the barriers to the implementation of such a pathway are multiple and are largely related to the lack of accessibility for patients to FLS, and to the mobilization of important and unsustainable human resources. Some French public hospitals or institutions are currently building some e_FLS models based on an automatic detection of patients with fractures, and a on a cloud-based system where practitioners across the health care sector can communicate and jointly manage osteoporotic patients. The investigators' hypothesis is that this web FLS (e_FLS) is at least as effective as the classical FLS for the secondary fracture prevention.

The objective of the investigators' study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture (evAB project).

Sex: All

Ages: 60+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Men and women aged above 60 years, living in France, with fragility fractures in response to low-energy trauma (e.g., a fall from standing height).
• The patient or his legal representative does not object to the patient's participation in the research Note: Patients in guardianship or curatorship can be included in this protocol

Exclusion criteria

• Pathological fractures, high trauma fractures and per prosthetic fractures.
• Non registration with a social security scheme (holder or beneficiary).

Trial design

0 participants in 2 patient groups

e_FLS

Description:

Patients detected by an automated patient detection tool with a web-based platform

FLS

Description:

Control group / Conventional group : Patients followed in a conventional fracture liaison department