Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of fluidized positioners and memory foam pillows in preventing pressure injuries in the head among pediatric patients.
H1: There is a significant difference between the fluidized positioner and the memory foam pillow in terms of pressure injury incidence in pediatric intensive care patients.
H2: The fluidized positioner reduces the risk of developing pressure injuries more effectively than the memory foam pillow.
H3: There is a significant difference in the pressure applied to the head region of the patient between the fluidized positioner and the memory foam pillow.
H4: The anatomical locations of pressure injuries (occipital, parietal, temporal, and ear regions) vary depending on the type of pillow used.
H5: Compared to the memory foam pillow, the fluidized positioner provides a more evenly distributed pressure across the occipital, parietal, temporal, and ear regions and prevents pressure concentration in specific areas.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
64 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Enes Şimşek, MSc. PhD(c); Remziye Semerci, PhD.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal