ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of the Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needing

K

Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hemiplegia

Treatments

Other: DN group
Other: ESWT group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Effective treatment of spasticity after stroke is a very important and serious problem. Some of the therapeutic approach include physiotherapy and medication. In the recent years external corporeal shockwave therapy and dry needling are commonly used for management of spasticity and pain after stroke. the purpose of this study is the comparative study between effectiveness of external corporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and dry needling (DN) on spasticity, pain, and upper limb function and sensation in individuals with hemiplegia.

Methods: In this study, individuals with hemiplegia were randomized 1:1 to parallel ESWT-Group (n = 10) or DN group (CG) (n = 10). Upper Extremity Functions, Sensation, Spasticity and Pain were evaluated. All measurement indicators were be evaluate before treatment and immediately after one session treatment. Mixedmodel repeated measured ANOVAs were then employed to determine if a group*time interaction existed on the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable for each group as the between-subjects variable and time as the within-subjects variables.

Full description

Effective treatment of spasticity after stroke is a very important and serious problem. Some of the therapeutic approach include physiotherapy and medication. In the recent years external corporeal shockwave therapy and dry needling are commonly used for management of spasticity and pain after stroke. the purpose of this study is the comparative study between effectiveness of external corporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and dry needling (DN) on spasticity, pain, and upper limb function and sensation in individuals with hemiplegia.

Methods: In this study, individuals with hemiplegia were randomized 1:1 to parallel ESWT-Group (n = 10) or DN group (CG) (n = 10). Upper Extremity Functions, Sensation, Spasticity and Pain were evaluated. All measurement indicators were be evaluate before treatment and immediately after one session treatment. Mixedmodel repeated measured ANOVAs were then employed to determine if a group*time interaction existed on the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable for each group as the between-subjects variable and time as the within-subjects variables.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

25 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • being between the age of 25-65
  • having been diagnosed with a stroke by a specialist, first time stroke
  • BBM spasticity, ability to understand command actions
  • stable vital signs, unchanged drug doses that might affect muscle spasticity
  • taking no antispastic medication
  • with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score more than 1 and less than 4 for the upper limb flexor tension

Exclusion criteria

  • received Botox, alcohol or phenol block treatments
  • received elbow joint surgical orthopedic surgery
  • history of epilepsy
  • severe mental disorders
  • malignant tumors; and limb venous thrombosis
  • sensory disturbances
  • the presence of any other neurological disorders
  • currently receiving other treatments
  • ESWT contraindications
  • exhibit fear of needles; or have any contraindication to DN

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

ESWT Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
ESWT Group: external corporeal shockwave therapy subjects in ESWT-group receiving one session shock wave therapy given 6,000 impulses at 0.06-0.07 mJ/mm2 (1.2-1.4 bar) at 18 Hz on biceps brachii
Treatment:
Other: ESWT group
DN Group
Experimental group
Description:
DN Group: dry needling Subjects in DN-group receiving dry needling using disposable stain less steel sterilized needles, 0.25×0.30. DN perform with patients in supine position, arm away from the trunk, and forearm in supination. The fast-in and fast-out cone shape technique adopt and each muscle needled for one minute
Treatment:
Other: DN group
Other: ESWT group

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems