ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of the Efficiency of Tissue Adhesive (Periacryl 90) and Silk Suture in Mandibular Impacted Wisdom Surgery

Y

Yuzuncu Yıl University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction

Treatments

Procedure: Impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06811974
YYU-04/18.05.2022

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, bilateral It is aimed to compare the efficacy of tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90) and silk suture in mandibular impacted wisdom tooth surgery.

Full description

In the study carried out on a total of 30 patients, 21 females and 9 males, 60 fully impacted lower wisdom teeth were extracted bilaterally and in the same position. One of the bilateral bilateral teeth of the patients was randomly selected and tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90) was applied for wound closure as the experimental group, while the other tooth was determined as the control group and the wound was closed with silk suture. The selected party was determined by the closed envelope method. After the first impacted tooth was extracted, it was waited until the wound healed and the symptoms disappeared completely, then the other tooth was extracted. In both tooth extractions, wound healing, edema and trismus were evaluated on the 3rd and 7th days. Wound healing was evaluated as good, acceptable and bad. VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used for pain assessment and assessment was made at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 35 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years who accepted the study conditions and had bilateral, bone or mucosal retention, and completely impacted wisdom teeth in the similar position with an indication for extraction due to prophylactic or orthodontic treatment in the lower jaw were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals with any systemic disease
  • Individuals with a history of allergy to the drugs to be used in the study
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding individuals
  • Individuals with pain, swelling or trismus in the last 10 days
  • Individuals with different positions on the right and left sides
  • Individuals who did not sign the voluntary consent form
  • Individuals with pathology in the impacted tooth area
  • Individuals with limited mouth opening

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90)
Active Comparator group
Description:
After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using tissue adhesive.
Treatment:
Procedure: Impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction
Silk suture
Active Comparator group
Description:
After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using silk sutures.
Treatment:
Procedure: Impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems