Comparison of the Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Limited-resources Setting.

Assiut University

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Benign Gynecologic Conditions

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07496814

Lap VS abd Hysterectom

Details and patient eligibility

About

Minimally invasive hysterectomy (laparoscopic) is associated with shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, faster recovery, and improved early postoperative quality of life compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. However, in low-resource settings, barriers such as equipment availability, cost, and limited surgeon experience may influence outcomes.

Enrollment: 32 estimated patients

Sex: Female

Ages: 35 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Women aged 35-65 years.
• Indication for elective hysterectomy for benign disease.
• Uterine size ≤ 16 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

• Malignancy or suspicion of malignancy.
• Prior extensive abdominal surgery with dense adhesions.
• Morbid obesity, BMI more than 40
• Severe cardiopulmonary disease.
• Pregnancy.
• Refusal participates in study

Trial design

32 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A

Description:

patients who have total Laparoscopic Hysterectomyfor benign gynecologic conditions

study group

Description:

patients have total Abdominal Hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions