ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

Yonsei University logo

Yonsei University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Nerve Block

Treatments

Procedure: obturator nerve block

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01080599
4-2009-0137

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Preexisting neurologic deficits
  • Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

Trial design

100 participants in 2 patient groups

conventional pubic approach
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: obturator nerve block
inguinal approach
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: obturator nerve block

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems